Site-to-Site VPN networks
We get calls all the time from companies that want to set up a site-to-site network securely over the Internet. Oftentimes they are replacing antiquated, super-expensive dedicated service from the phone company (T1 lines, ISDN, etc). There are a number of issues with site-to-site networking that need to be considered.
First, any site-to-site network has to be secure. It would be better to have a non-working site-to-site network than an insecure one. Virtually every company has some sort of sensitive data that they don’t want exposed to prying eyes, from payroll data to customer lists and so on. It turns out that the security requirements for a solid site-to-site implementation are very similar to the requirements for a good remote access VPN: data privacy through strong encryption, authentication of both ends of the connection to each other, and active monitoring of the connection.
The next most important aspect of a site-to-site network is getting (and keeping) it working. Set-up of site-to-site VPN connections is traditionally a job for network ninjas only, due to the vast array of choices and the myriad technical details that must be addressed during configuration. Network elements like NATs and firewalls tend to get in the way, as well. And with traditional site-to-site links (implemented using IPSec), having even one mis-matched parameter will prevent the connection from coming up.
Maintenance is also an issue. There is a well-known problem in site-to-site networking called the n-squared
problem. It means that as the number of sites grow, the number of links you have to maintain between sites tends to grow quadratically. Here’s an example, based on IPSec: if you have two sites, you have 2 sets of configurations (one at each end). If you have 3 sites, you have 6 configurations (each router connecting to each other router). By the time you have 5 sites, you have 20 configurations, and if you’re unlucky enough to have 10 sites, you are at 90. A 100-site enterprise needs 9,900 router configurations to bring up all of its tunnels! Every time you add a site to the network, you have to touch every other site, and just setting up monitoring software to make sure the network is always working is a task in itself.
The last of the big issues I’m going to touch on today is performance. Site-to-site networks have even higher performance requirements than traditional remote access VPN connections, because an entire office of people is depending on the link instead of a single remote worker. Performance tuning of site-to-site VPN tunnels is a bit of an art, and it depends on the precise characteristics of the underlying network links. Sometimes adjustments to the applications themselves can be made to improve their performance, and sometimes network architecture changes can be implemented to work around slow links. In any case, having a highly tuned tunnel system is critical for a successful site-to-site deployment.
Of course, my favorite solution is to bring in Positive’s engineering team to handle all of these problems for you. Positive’s system was architected from the ground up to handle the security, scalability, manageability, and performance issues that are inherent in site-to-site networks. If you have questions about your own site-to-site situation, feel free to leave a comment or to give us a call.
February 25th, 2007 at 9:58 am
I disagree. The cost of using of T1 connections is hardly noticiable compared to its benefits of a super fast internet connection and security to match. Although in perspective to Site-to-Site VPN networks, T1 connections are relatively expensive, in the end the benefits outweigh the costs.
T1 Service
February 25th, 2007 at 9:50 pm
Hi Fred,
A full mesh of T1 lines is really expensive; you’d have to post numbers if you want to disagree on that point. It’s usually slower than alternatives, too, but of course that depends on geography, etc. It requires a network engineer to set up and manage. It requires static routing (hard to maintain) or dynamic routing (needs an engineer). It requires lots of hardware (what do CSU/DSU’s cost these days?). It usually requires a complex relationship with a telephone company.
I am going to go out on a limb and presume you’re not talking about a literal full-mesh site-to-site T1 network, because that would be nuts. If you’re talking about a frame-relay network, well, you have all of the problems of the T1 network with a somewhat scaled-back price, but it still can’t touch a VPN solution on cost (to say nothing of maintainability, scalability, etc.)
T1 lines are a perfectly reasonable (although increasingly, pretty slow) way to get Internet access, but as a private site-to-site network solution, they’re a pretty bad solution.
-Steve
May 12th, 2008 at 8:24 am
“I disagree. The cost of using of T1 connections is hardly noticiable compared to its benefits of a super fast internet connection and security to match. Although in perspective to Site-to-Site VPN networks, T1 connections are relatively expensive, in the end the benefits outweigh the costs.” - LOL !
May 14th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
0834a70f914d…
0834a70f914d9cd1b126…